5 Tips for Vetting Remote Developers

Past performance is often the best predictor of future success. Developers with experience in similar projects can anticipate challenges, implement best practices, and deliver more efficient solutions.

Implementation Steps

a. Request Specific Portfolio Examples

Rather than reviewing a general portfolio, ask candidates to share specific examples relevant to your needs—request projects in your industry or with similar technical requirements to what you're building. Ask them to clarify their particular role and contributions to each project, the challenges they faced, and how they overcame them.

b. Check References

Reference checks should be strategic, not perfunctory.

When contacting references, ask specific questions like "How did they handle unexpected technical challenges?" or "What was their communication style during critical project phases?" The question "Would you hire them again for a similar project?" often reveals more than a dozen general inquiries.

Expert Tip!

Ask developers to walk you through their code from a previous project. Their ability to explain their thinking process reveals technical proficiency and communication skills.

Technical skills assessment separates skilled developers from those who look good on paper. According to recent research, 92% of developers prefer skills-based hiring over traditional resumé screening.

A comprehensive technical evaluation reveals what a developer knows and how they apply that knowledge. It shows their problem-solving approach, code quality standards, and ability to work within your technical ecosystem.

Implementation Steps

a. Three-Phase Technical Evaluation

Phase 1: Portfolio Review: Examine code quality, documentation, and project architecture. Assess their code organization and problem-solving approach. Review GitHub contributions and open-source participation to see how they work in broader technical communities.

Phase 2: Structured Skills Testing: Use platform-based assessments for fundamental skills that provide standardized evaluation. Implement language-specific testing for core technologies your project requires. Evaluate problem-solving abilities with algorithmic challenges that reveal thinking patterns.

Phase 3: Live Coding Session:

Present a realistic problem related to your project and observe their real-time problem-solving approach and thought process. This allows you to assess code quality, testing strategies, and debugging skills as they encounter challenges.

Check out DevMatch to create and run take-home assessments your candidates love and have the most signal.

Expert Tip!

Rather than focusing solely on whether the code works, evaluate how the developer handles feedback and iteration during live coding sessions. This reveals adaptability and collaboration potential.

Technical brilliance without communication skills can derail projects. According to a Zoom study, developers spend 42% of their time collaborating with others—making interpersonal skills critical for success.

Developers must excel at written communication, virtual collaboration, and autonomous problem-solving without in-person interaction.

Implementation Steps

a. Communication Assessment

Communication assessment should evaluate written communication via email exchanges, which reveals clarity and professionalism.

Assess verbal communication during video interviews to gauge articulation and listening skills.

Test documentation abilities through a small writing exercise that shows how well they can explain technical concepts.

b. Collaboration Simulation

Role-play challenging scenarios that might occur during your project. Present an ambiguous requirement and observe what clarification questions they ask. Conduct a mock code review discussion to see how they give and receive feedback.

c. Remote Work Compatibility

Remote work compatibility deserves special attention for distributed teams. Assess time management through deadline-driven tasks that reveal prioritization skills.

Evaluate self-direction by observing follow-through on assignments without prompting.

Test adaptability with unexpected interview format changes to see how they handle disruption.

Expert Tip!

Include team members in the interview process who will work directly with the developer to assess team chemistry and cultural fit. Their perspectives often reveal compatibility issues that hiring managers might miss.

Even the most thorough vetting process cannot perfectly predict performance. A trial period validates a developer's capabilities while minimizing risk.

These periods allow both parties to evaluate fit before making long-term commitments. Developers can experience your work environment, and you can observe their performance on realistic tasks.

Implementation Steps

Establish a reasonable timeframe (typically 1-2 weeks) that respects their time while providing sufficient data. Provide necessary context and resources to ensure they can succeed if capable.

a. Evaluation Framework

Have a detailed evaluation framework that assesses performance across multiple dimensions.

Technical implementation quality shows their coding standards in practice. Problem-solving approach reveals how they tackle obstacles.

Communication frequency and clarity demonstrate their remote work capabilities.

Responsiveness to feedback indicates adaptability and teamwork potential. Deadline adherence shows reliability and time management.

b. Fair Compensation Structure

Offer competitive payment for trial work that recognizes the value of their time and effort. Consider project-based payment rather than hourly to focus on results rather than time spent. Clearly outline terms before beginning the trial to avoid misunderstandings.

Expert Tip!

Design trial projects that simulate your working environment—including team collaboration, code review processes, and client interaction. The more realistic the trial, the better it predicts long-term success.

Q1. What are some tips for conducting a successful technical skill assessment?

When conducting technical assessments:

• Customize evaluations to your specific project requirements instead of using generic tests
• Provide clear instructions and expectations about what you're assessing and how
• Use a multi-method approach combining code reviews, skill-specific tests, and live coding exercises to gain a comprehensive understanding of capabilities
• Focus on process over outcome by asking candidates to explain their thinking, not just deliver solutions

Q2. What are the benefits of implementing a trial period for developers?

Trial periods provide several advantages:

• Real-world performance data beyond what interviews can reveal
• Team compatibility insights showing how the developer interacts with existing team members
• Two-way evaluation allows both your company and the developer to assess the fit
• Risk mitigation by identifying potential issues before making a full-time commitment
• Smooth onboarding transition if the trial leads to permanent hiring

Q3. How does working with a specialized recruitment agency like Bridge Labs improve the vetting process?

There are several benefits to working with a recruitment agency like Bridge Labs:

Partnering with Bridge Labs offers:

• Access to pre-vetted talent pools saves significant screening time
• Cultural fit evaluation with insight into both technical and interpersonal compatibility
• Streamlined process management from initial screening through trial period implementation
• Market knowledge advantage with insights into compensation trends and availability